Search the Collection

Sir Arthur Hesilrige

(1601-1661), Statesman and parliamentarian

Sitter in 4 portraits
Colonel Sir Arthur Hesilrige was a powerful Republican politician and distinguished soldier. He was one of the five Members of Parliament who, warned of Charles I's intention to impeach them, fled the House of Commons on 3 January 1642; this was a key moment in the breakdown of the King's authority. In the war Hesilrige commanded a cavalry regiment known as the 'lobsters' on account of their old fashioned full armour. At the Restoration his life was saved because he had refused to sign Charles I's death warrant, but he was committed to the Tower of London, where he died shortly afterwards.

List Thumbnail

Sir Arthur Hesilrige, by Unknown artist - NPG 6440

Sir Arthur Hesilrige

by Unknown artist
oil on canvas, circa 1650
NPG 6440

Sir Arthur Hesilrige, possibly by R. Grave - NPG D28931

Sir Arthur Hesilrige

possibly by R. Grave
line engraving, early 19th century
NPG D28931

Sir Arthur Hesilrige, by R. Grave - NPG D28932

Sir Arthur Hesilrige

by R. Grave
line engraving, early 19th century
NPG D28932

Sir Arthur Hesilrige, by R. Grave, after  Unknown artist - NPG D3330

Sir Arthur Hesilrige

by R. Grave, after Unknown artist
line engraving, early-mid 19th century (1640)
NPG D3330

Place

Tell us more back to top

Can you tell us more about this person? Spotted an error, information that is missing (a sitter’s life dates, occupation or family relationships, or a date of portrait for example) or do you know anything that we don't know? If you have information to share please complete the form below.

If you require information from us, please use our Archive enquiry service. If you wish to license an image, please use our Rights and Images service.

Please note that we cannot provide valuations.

We digitise over 8,000 portraits a year and we cannot guarantee being able to digitise images that are not already scheduled.

Laurie Pettitt

3 March 2017, 21:57

A strange character, this. Governor od Newcastle at the time of Cromwell's invasion of Scotland. When Cromwell left Berwick Upon Tweed, the Guild Book says that Hesilrige was given 2,500 men to keep the road between Berwick and Edinburgh open. This he failed to do because Cromwell complained on the 2nd September 1650 that the Scots had occupied the pass at Cockburnspath blocking his retreat. Retreat proved unnecessary because Cromwell demolished the Scottish Army. Even so, Hesilrige shewed a tardiness in sending much needed reserves to Cromwell.
Where Hesilrige really comes into the firing line was in the treatment of the Scottish Prisoners. The 'story' has always been that the men were force marched to Durham, falling down in starved and exhausted condition etc. They were force marched to Durham for the single reason that there was no0 food to be had in the Whole of East Lothian. Nowhere between Dunbar and durham would have the resources to feed up to 5,000 men. Many of the men complained of not having eaten for four days before the Battle. Basically, the Muster had demanded 30 days supplies for up to 30,000 men (40 days if above Aberdeen). All the men from 14 to 60 had gone to the muster.
Everything that could produce new crops had gone to war. Leslie was 45 days into 30 days worth of supplies.
I don't need to say much more on this, but point you towards Hesilrige's Letter to the Council of State for Scotland and Ireland which describes the journey and the treatment of prisoners in Durham Cathedral. It will look to you as it looked to me, a pack of lies until you see what happened to the Allied Prisoners of the Japanese when people tried to feed them in 1945. They Died. It is now called 'Refeeding Syndrome'. A dangerous condition today, even in modern hospital surroundings.
I think that Hesilrige did try to feed the prisoners and failed because of a syndrome that would have to wait for 295 years for a name.

What can you tell us?close

There are occasions when we are unsure of the identity of a sitter or artist, their life dates, occupation or have not recorded their family relationships. Sometimes we have not recorded the date of a portrait. Do you have specialist knowledge or a particular interest about any aspect of the portrait or sitter or artist that you can share with us? We would welcome any information that adds to and enhances our information and understanding about a particular portrait, sitter or artist.

Citationclose

How do you know this? Please could you let us know your source of information.

* Permission to publish (Privacy information)
Privacy Informationclose

The National Portrait Gallery will NOT use your information to contact you or store for any other purpose than to investigate or display your contribution. By ticking permission to publish you are indicating your agreement for your contribution to be shown on this collection item page. Please note your email address will not be displayed on the page nor will it be used for any marketing material or promotion of any kind.

Please ensure your comments are relevant and appropriate. Your contributions must be polite and with no intention of causing trouble. All contributions are moderated.

Your Emailclose

Contributions are moderated. We'll need your email address so that we can follow up on the information provided and contact you to let you know when your contribution has been published.