1 of 17 portraits of Walter Crane
- Extended catalogue entry
© National Portrait Gallery, London
by George Frederic Watts
Oil on canvas, 1891
26 1/8 in. x 22 in. (663 mm x 560 mm)
Click on the links below to find out more:
Inscriptionback to top
On reverse, canvas stamp: Winsor & Newton.
On back of frame, three labels:
(a) printed: Brussels International Exhibition 1897 / BRITISH FINE ART SECTION / No.[torn] / DICKSEE [torn] Agents / 7 Ry [torn] James St.
(b) printed and handwritten (where torn, an underlying label with a design in red visible): BERMONDSEY SETTLEMENT / PICTURE EXHIBITION / Name of Owner: G.F. Watts / Address: c/o W Crane 13 Holland A [torn].
(c) printed and handwritten: ROYAL COMMISSION / INTERNATIONAL FINE ART EXHIBITION / ROME 1911 / BRITISH SECTION / Name of Artist: G F Watts / Title of Work: Portrait of Walter Crane / Name of Owner: The Trustees Watts Gallery / Address: Compton G [torn] /Board of Trade Exhibition Branch.
This portraitback to top
Sitter and artist had been acquainted for some years when this portrait was proposed. Crane recalled that [i]t was at one of the meetings of the Council of Management of the South London Fine Art Gallery, held at Lord Leightons studio, that Mr Watts first asked me to give him sittings for a portrait which he painted of me this year (1891) saying he had so few artists in his collection, a reference to Wattss Hall of Fame . Both men were active in the establishment of the South London Art Gallery in Camberwell (Crane designed a tile floor and Watts laid the foundation stone) and in other efforts to widen access to art, including the National Association for the Advancement of Art and its Application to Industry. In 1882, Watts had purchased Cranes Renascence of Venus and in 1886 Crane returned the compliment with a sonnet on Wattss The Souls Prism. Both favoured symbolic and figurative subjects, Crane remarking that in Britain hardly anyone besides Mr Watts showed interest in his own allegorical works;  he registered Wattss death as the loss of a generous and valued friend.  For his part, Watts appears to have admired Cranes social and artistic idealism; otherwise, as an only moderately successful artist he was an unlikely candidate for the Hall of Fame.
According to Crane, sittings occupied seven two-hour sessions at Wattss London studio between 19 August and 27 September 1891; Watts used to begin at eleven oclock in the morning and I sat till one oclock at the first laying in he got the likeness and the general effect; then gradually worked into it, getting solidity and modelling, and towards the last moved up his easel nearer, until he was quite close.  The artists wife Mary Seton Watts recorded that the initial painting conveyed the idea of one who never turned his back but marched straight forwards, ,the eye appearing to look into a thousand unknown tomorrows.  Watts echoed this, saying I have given it the forward look, to which Crane replied I have always looked to the future since I was a boy, and I hope I shall never give up doing so.  Two sittings later, however, Mary Watts thought the soul has gone out like a light it is nothing more than an ordinary portrait.  During the last scheduled sitting, a visitor brought news of a new invention, the aeroplane (which Crane forecast would be used to bomb besieged cities), and during a short final sitting on 6 October the artist recaptured the sitters forward-looking air. 
The work is carefully and sweetly painted with smooth and often delicate brushstrokes, especially to delineate Cranes fair, wispy hair. The light falling from the right makes the pink ear rather prominent. The clothing is more broadly brushed, while the background is roughly scumbled in a mixture of brown and ochre. The colour range is brown/yellow, with red notes in the flesh tones and pocket handkerchief and the chair at Cranes back. As noted, the sitters visible eye is shown gazing into the distance, as if with expectation. The portrait is the primary known likeness in Cranes relatively small iconography, owing largely to the skill and reputation of the artist.
When exhibited in 1892, the portrait was well received, bringing praise from fellow Academicians that astonished Watts; Millais, he said, used the word sublime.  Likewise, Herkomer congratulated the artist on his great portrait of Walter Crane. Publicly the critics were equally impressed. The Athenaeum (F.G. Stephens) wrote: The coat of brown-olive velvet assorts admirably with the rich ruddy brown of the carnations and the lighter brown, with grayish lights, of the hair. The golden underpainting of the flesh, the broad, choice and firm modelling and the noble simplicity of the picture make it an example of what modern portraiture might be. The expression, if somewhat more restful and serene than Mr Cranes usually is, is first rate, while the likeness is perfect'.  Claude Phillips, for the Art Journal, described it as the only portrait this year, which comes within the category of great art: of portraiture as the great masters of the sixteenth century understood it truthful in higher truth, which aims less at the transient likeness of a human face at one given moment than at an expression of the whole individuality, summed up with a lofty and discerning sympathy in all that is most permanent and essential.  As Phillips also queried the date of the work, thinking it showed Crane some years younger, the sitter confirmed that it had been painted the previous year. 
Phillipss comment also perhaps points to the fact that NPG 1750 is stylistically different from Wattss other Hall of Fame portraits of 189091, being notably fresher and more fluid. Privately, the artist remarked, I assure you it is cared for because of the absence of texture, that which to me is its greatest defect.  Burne-Jones confirmed that Watts did not like to hear the work praised. He likes to think of his vast powers of mind. Of his powerful intellect. He cant be pacified with anything else, so were obliged to mention it. I wonder hes not satisfied with being a great painter But he doesnt count it. Hes not content with any painting he does. He wants to be known as the painter who thought, not as the painter who painted. 
When exhibited at the International exhibition in Brussels in 1897, the likeness was praised for The warm brown complexion, heightened by a ruddy glow [and] the character of the face, at once simple and powerful, [which] stamp this portrait on the mind as that of a master by a master,.
As the exhibition record demonstrates, the work was shown regularly before the Second World War,  but later received much less attention, owing to the declining reputations of both artist and sitter; that of Watts has subsequently re-risen, that of Crane to a lesser extent.
Dr Jan Marsh
Footnotesback to top
1) Crane 1907, pp.3578.
2) Crane 1907, p.431.
3) Crane 1907, p.496.
4) Crane 1907, 36061.
5) Mary Seton Watts, Diaries, 19 Aug. 1891; quoted Gould 2004, p.257.
6) Mary Seton Watts, Diaries, 28 Sept. 1891; quoted Gould 2004, p.258.
7) Mary Seton Watts, Diaries, 30 Aug. 1891; quoted in letter from M.S. Watts to C.J. Holmes, 17 Apr. 1915, NPG RP 1750.
8) Mary Seton Watts, Diaries, 5 Sept. 1891; quoted Gould 2004, p.258.
9) Mary Seton Watts, Diaries, 6 Oct. 1891; quoted Gould 2004, p.258. In her catalogue of her husbands work Mary Watts gives the total number of sittings as five (Watts 1912, vol.2, p.41), and in a letter to C.J. Holmes dated 17 Apr. 1917 (NPG RP 1750) as six sittings between 19 Aug. and 27 Sept., with the additional information: I mention this because the picture is cited as one of his most rapidly painted portraits, and to support a theory that he painted but at white heat; but this was not so, it was quite usual for him to require only [sic] five sittings for a portrait. Crane (1907, pp.36061) itemizes eight sittings altogether (19, 20, 22, 24, 30 Aug., 6, 27 Sept. and 6 Oct.) and appears to rely on diary evidence. The discrepancy is unimportant but Cranes memory appears more reliable.
10) Watts 1912, vol.2, p.200.
11) Letter from H. von Herkomer to G.F. Watts, 19 Sept. 1892; Watts Letters, Album 11, p.83, NPG Archive.
12) Athenaeum, 30 Apr. 1892, p.574. The reference to carnations must indicate reddish tones on the sitters cheeks and neck, from an obsolete meaning for pink (flesh-colour) hues in painting. No flowers are visible in the portrait.
13) AJ, 1892, p.222.
14) Letter from W. Crane to AJ, Sept. 1892, p.2878.
15) Watts 1912, vol.2, p.200.
16) Lago 1981, p.139.
17) MA, 1897, p.280.
18) A photograph of the portrait by Frederick Hollyer was registered for copyright 1907 Aug. 27: National Archives (copy 1/512/388).
Physical descriptionback to top
Quarter-length profile to left, sandy hair, blue eyes and ruddy cheeks, wearing brown jacket and yellow tie with pearl pin, back of brick-red upholstered chair to right.
Conservationback to top
Conserved, 1915; 1987.
Provenanceback to top
Gift from artist, 1915.
Exhibitionsback to top
New Gallery, London, 18923 (53).
Modern Picture, Nottingham Museum and Art Gallery, 1892 (270, repr.).
Liverpool, 1894 (1187).
Royal Scottish Academy, Edinburgh, 1895.
New Gallery, London, 1896 (110).
St Petersburg, 1897.
Royal Academy, London, 1905 (212).
Manchester City Art Gallery, 1905 (83).
International Fine Arts Exhibition, Rome, 1911 (108).
George Frederic Watts, Tate Gallery, London, 19545 (78).
G.F. Watts: The Hall of Fame, NPG, London; Laing Art Gallery, Newcastle, 1975.
Reading Museum and Art Gallery, JuneJuly 1976.
G.F. Watts: The Hall of Fame, NPG touring exh., Nottingham Art Gallery, 1980; Usher Art Gallery, Lincoln, 198081; Leicester Museum and Art Gallery, 1981.
Reproductionsback to top
Illustrated London News, 7 May 1892, supplement on New Gallery exhibition, p.1 (engr. by Meisenbach).
Magazine of Art, 1892, p.293.
Hubert von Herkomer requested permission for his pupil D.A. Wehrschmidt to undertake an engraving (Herkomer to G.F. Watts, 19 Sept. 1892, Watts Letters, Album 11, pp.834, NPG Archive) but if executed this has not been located.
Scribners Magazine, 1894, p.705.
Magazine of Art, 1898, p.632.
Monkhouse 1899, p.21.
'The Pictures of 1892', Pall Mall Gazette 'Extra', no.62, 2 May 1892, p.106
Crane 1907, frontispiece.
MacCarthy 1994, pl.98.