Sir Edward John Poynter, 1st Bt
- Extended catalogue entry
© National Portrait Gallery, London
Sir Edward John Poynter, 1st Bt
by Sir Philip Burne-Jones, 2nd Bt
Oil on canvas , 1909
33 7/8 in. x 24 1/4 in. (860 mm x 615 mm)
Click on the links below to find out more:
Inscriptionback to top
Inscr. in red lower left: P.B-J.1899.
On reverse of canvas, faint Robersons stamp.
Labels formerly on stretcher:
(a) By Sir Philip Burne-Jones, Bt, exhibited The Dowdeswell Galleries AprilMay 1914 / Subject : Sir Edward Poynter Bt. P.R.A (removed January 1938, now in Primary Collection Associated Items plan chest, NPG Archive).
(b) Royal Commission for the Rome Exhibition (recorded in NPG RP 1951).
This portraitback to top
The sitter is shown painting a small canvas of a seated female figure. At the date of this portrait he was in his seventy-third year, with a long career in painting and art administration behind him.
The artist Philip Burne-Jones and the sitter were closely connected through the sitters wife, Agnes Macdonald Poynter, who was the artists maternal aunt. The portrait, exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1910, forms one of a series of Great Men at Work produced by the artist in the early 1900s, which began with those of his father Edward Burne-Jones (NPG 1864) and his cousin Rudyard Kipling (NPG 1863). Here, however, Poynters age and the relatively small size of the picture combine to present him as a declining figure, without any allusion to the ambitious productions of his earlier career.
The portrait appears to have remained with or returned to the artist, who in 1922 offered it to the National Portrait Gallery, observing, Its rather a nice picture, though I suppose Im not the man to say that. Anyway, would you allow me to send it along on approval as the shop people say? I cant afford to present it to the gallery, or I would.  The Trustees agreed to purchase the work in a swift transaction completed on 30 June.  A year later the artist responded to a query regarding the background details:
I do not think any further description of my portrait is necessary than Sir Edward Poynter at work. The portrait was actually painted in my own studio here [41 Egerton Terrace, London SW3] & the picture on the Easel I indicated from a work of Sir Edwards long ago finished I think I did it from a reproduction of some sort. It is of no importance. I have forgotten the name of the picture. It was something like Horae Serenae or something of that kind but I dont think that matters. 
In fact, Horae Serenae (RA 1894; now Bristol CMAG) is a Leighton-like frieze of classical maidens dancing, and the canvas here depicted is On the Terrace (RA 1889; now NM Liverpool), a young woman in classical drapery in a composition reminiscent of Alma-Tadema. First reproduced in 1889,  On the Terrace was also issued as a large-scale colour print, which was evidently the reproduction that Burne-Jones used for the present work. The image on the wall behind the sitter is of God creating the Sun and Stars from Michelangelos Sistine Chapel, which may be an allusion to arts dependence on light; it is not known if this was a conceit, or a glimpse into the studio of either sitter or artist.
Some pentimenti are visible at the lower left side of the sitter, indicating that the back of his jacket has been extended over previously painted parts of the chairback and seat.
According to The Timess critic, Sir Philip Burne-Jones has succeeded admirably with his portrait of his uncle Sir Edward Poynter, painting at his easel. Since the Lord Rayleigh of some years ago, this is quite the artists best work. 
According to the Graphic a year later, the format chosen for the whole series of Great Men at Work was:
portraiture on a small scale, but conceived in a large way each man engaged in his own home at the occupation with which his life is identified. There is therefore, an intimacy and interest about these portraits, which are absent from a mere likeness of a sitter. The picture becomes a document a record in which the interest centres even more in the revelation of the man at work than in the actual likeness or in the artistic quality of the painting.
In the case of the present work, however, the profile pose selected, the sitters advanced age and the fact that the setting is not his studio, all reduce the presentation of personality, and challenge the critics general claim that the artists representation of a man chez lui brings us a better understanding of him.  Or, this flat, uncommunicative image may be an acute rendering of the temperamentally reserved Poynter, whose assiduity in arts administration eclipsed his reputation as a painter.
Images of the sitter in his own studio at The Avenue, Fulham Road, include photographs by Joseph Parkin Mayall (NPG Ax27833) and Ralph Winwood Robinson (NPG x7386). A more expressive portrait is the etching by Alphonse Legros (NPG D5553).
Dr Jan Marsh
Footnotesback to top
1) Letter from P. Burne-Jones to Hon. Frederick Wallop, NPG Trustee, 12 June 1922, NPG RP 1951.
2) Letter from P. Burne-Jones to J.D. Milner, 23 June 1922 and 1 July 1922, NPG RP 1951.
3) Letter from P. Burne-Jones to C.K. Adams, 14 June 1923, NPG RP 1951.
4) AJ, 1889, p.6.
5) The Times, 4 May 1909, p.14.
6) Graphic, 28 May 1910, p.774.
Physical descriptionback to top
Whole-length, profile to right, white hair and beard, wearing loose dark-grey suit, seated on rush-chair at easel painting with brush and mahlstick, in background long horizontal cupboard beneath painted depiction of a section of the Sistine Chapel ceiling.
Conservationback to top
Provenanceback to top
With the artist, from whom purchased in 1922 for 100 guineas.
Exhibitionsback to top
RA 1909 (241).
International Fine Arts Exhibition, Rome, 1911 (140).
Dowdeswell Galleries, London, 1914.
Reproductionsback to top
Spielmann 1911, p.190.
The Connoisseur, vol.64, September 1922, p.55.
Ward 1926, p.244.
View all known portraits for Sir Edward John Poynter, 1st Bt