Raeburn's Rival, Archibald Skirving 1749 - 1819:
A Review of the Frames
by Laura Houliston
This article reviews the frames in the exhibition "Raeburn's
Rival, Archibald Skirving 1749-1819", held at the Scottish
National Portrait Gallery from 27 January to 5 April 1999. Skirving
was a prolific pastellist and his mastery in this medium sets
him apart from other portraitists of the time.
Just as Henry Raeburn and many other British artists of this
period travelled to Italy to further their artistic skills and
career, so Archibald Skirving spent the years 1787 to 1794 in
Rome. His pastels of Francis Charteris, Viscount Elcho of
Amisfield and Francis Charteris, 8th Earl of Wemyss,
both of 1790, were completed, and most likely framed whilst
Skirving was in Rome. This pair of Italian frames consist of
poplar wood (visible on the reverse) with carved, overlapping
laurel leaf detail on the top edge (possibly boxwood), beading
on the inner edge (missing in areas), and a plain back hollow,
a standard Roman product of the 1790s. |

Fig. 1
Benjamin
Yule of Wheatfield by Archibald Skirving, c.1796-1800, pastel, 28.5
x 25.3 cm (Private Collection)

Fig. 2
Margaret Sym, Mrs John Wilson by Archibald Skirving, c.
1797-1800, pastel, 68.5 x 56 cm (Scottish National Portrait Gallery)

Fig. 3
Henry Home Drummond, 6th Laird of Blair Drummond by Archibald
Skirving, c. 1798, pastel, 59.8 x 44.4 cm (Private Collection) |
Also very Roman
in character are the frames on two smaller pastels, Benjamin
Yule (fig. 1) and Marion Sprot, Mrs Benjamin Yule
of c. 1796-1800. These original frames show a flat top edge,
angular leaf-and-tongue detail, flat, fillet, string-and-pearl,
and inner spandrel. They relate closely in the exhibition to
the frames used by another British artist in Rome, Hugh Douglas
Hamilton, despite lacking the corner rosettes in the hatched
inner spandrels. These Hamilton works were completed and framed
in Rome, so denoting an Italian design. The frames on the Skirvings
were most likely copied from this type (without hatching and
rosettes) and perhaps made in Edinburgh, the beading visibly
more crude.
Skirving returned
to Edinburgh in 1795 when a number of recurring frame types can
be identified. The frames surrounding three works circa 1800,
William Craig, Lord Craig, Alexander Fraser Tytler,
Lord Woodhouselee and Margaret Sym, Mrs John Wilson
(fig. 2) show certain stylistic similarities. Although the outer
elements vary, the inner details are alike; the sight edge leading
to a flat, a small scotia with a tightly twisted ribbon below
a fillet, and then a scotia. The Alexander Fraser Tytler
frame seems to have been embellished with incised scrolling leaves
on the corners of the inner flat, and applied acanthus leaves
in the corners of the scotia, the reeded top rail with entwined
ribbon. The Lord Craig frame has beading at the base of
the scotia and an egg-and-dart back edge; further research is
required for the distinctive reel-and-triple-bead feature below
the top edge of this frame.
Another frame
type of this period is found on the pastel John Clerk of Eldin
of 1799 - 1800, the basic profile section of which is also found
on Henry Home Drummond, 6th Laird of Blair Drummond
(fig. 3) and Mary Drummond, Mrs John Pringle of Stitchell,
both of c.1798. The John Clerk of Eldin frame consists
of a flat top edge, leaf-and-tongue detail on a flat section
below (badly re-gessoed in places), a small ovolo moulding, a
flat area, a characteristic fillet border, and incorporating
a small string-and-pearl detail towards the sight edge. It is
unknown who was framing for Skirving at this date. The frame
on Mrs Johnston of Hutton Hall of c. 1796-1800
has a different moulding but contains similar stylistic elements.
The portrait of Archibald Skirving of c.1810 after
Sir Henry Raeburn also has a frame which uses these elements,
although the positioning of the beading and leaf-and-tongue detail
is reversed. Despite this frame having been re-gilt and the sight
slip replaced, it is possibly an original frame.
|
It is appropriate to mention that many of the works
discussed here are of family descent, so strengthening the argument
that these are the original frames. A substantial percentage
of the works in the exhibition are from private collections,
with their continuity in ownership contributing greatly to the
apparent survival of the original frames. In addition to this,
a large majority of Skirving's work are pastels and chalks, which
often maintain their original frames and glazing due to the fragility
of the materials, and the potential damage which would be caused
with replacement.
This leads on to a pastel with its original gilt frame and glass,
Robert Dundas of Arniston of 1800-1. Where the title of
the exhibition draws comparison with Henry Raeburn, this frame
type is one which can be stylistically linked to those found
on the work of Raeburn at this time. Although the cabling is
slightly looser than normally expected, the frame is almost identical
to those previously linked to an Edinburgh framemaker c.1800,
Alexander Thomson. |

Fig. 4
Isabella Fraser Tytler by Archibald Skirving, c. 1801,
pastel, 62.4 x 54 cm (The Sir Henry Wade Trust)

Fig 5
Robert Dundas of Arniston by Archibald Skirving, 1800-1,
pastel, 106.1 x 65.4 cm (The Dundas-Bekker Family)
Detail showing curve in inside edge of frame to suit bowed shape
of glass. |
A pastel situated
in close proximity, Isabella Fraser Tytler of c. 1801
(fig. 4), has its original frame and is also in this 'Raeburn'
style, i.e. the plain tongue detail towards the sight edge, bordered
by a fillet, the flat with its corner joints characteristically
at a right angle whilst the jointing in the hollow is diagonal,
the ball-and-cabled bobbin (carved) at the base of the hollow,
ribbon-and-reed top edge, and egg-and-dart detailing on the back
edge. Both of these gilt frames have an appropriate date for
association with Thomson who worked nearby Skirving, at the Head
of Calton from 1799 to 1809.
It is interesting
to note that the Robert Dundas of Arniston frame's inside
edge is adapted to accommodate the glass (see fig. 5). The glass
has a discrepancy common to the broad glass method of production,
the manufacturing technique which entailed flattening the sheet
of glass from a cylindrical shape. The inside sight edge is wider
at the corners than in the centre, in order to fit the bowed
shape of the front of the glass. Slight ripples are visible in
the glass.
|
|
The evidence
would indicate that works were framed and glazed in the studio
before going to the patron, so that Skirving would have inevitably
played a decisive role in the choice of frames. A large number
of works mentioned in the inventories by George Watson and William
Bruce, completed on Skirving's death, are listed as "framed
and glazed". These inventories are shown in the exhibition
along with the original bill from the Edinburgh firm of carvers
and gilders, Chalmers and Son, which spans the years 1814 to
1818. Chalmers' bill shows that they supplied Skirving with London
crown glass and plate glass. Crown glass would only have been
used on the smaller works as panes were cut from discs spun to
a maximum diameter of four feet. William Chalmers was first listed
in the Post Office Directories in 1799 as a 'picture framer and
gilder' with his son, Thomas, later joining him in partnership.
Their workshops and warerooms were situated on the High Street,
in Edinburgh's Old Town, with their prominent business continuing
into the 1840s.
There are three
non-gilt frames in the exhibition which can be positively linked
with Chalmers. Where the frames surrounding Raeburn's work were
exclusively gilt, as seen in the Raeburn exhibition held in 1997,
the frames on Skirving's work include differing woods. The survival
of the framer's bill documents his use of varying wood types.
|

Fig. 6
Captain Robert Skirving by Andrew Geddes, 1813, oil on
panel, 66 x 45 cm (Scottish National Portrait Gallery). |
The first to be discussed is Captain
Robert Skirving of Croys of 1813 by Andrew Geddes (fig. 6),
an oil on panel, which has an oak carcass and backboard (visible
on the reverse) and walnut veneer on the front with a plain gilt
sight edge. The walnut veneered flat has a solid walnut moulding
attached to the outer edge and the sight edge is most likely
replaced. This picture is documented in the Chalmers accounts
under the entry of 4 April 1818, "To an oak frame for
a Portrait of his brother by Geddes - and pasting a Board on
the face for backing" and is priced at five shillings.
However, the frame front is not oak, and it remains to be established
if the later entry of 21 September is applicable, "To
a walnut Tree & Gold frame - 9 feet 9 Inches at 4/- per foot".
This walnut frame cost £1 19 shillings. There are numerous
listings for frames "Brown and Gold", in addition
to a "Mahogany and Gold" frame at three shillings
per foot. |
Two similar frames, most likely by Chalmers, are
Skirving's An Unknown Lady of 1816 and Father James
McCormick of c.1787-94, both red chalk drawings. Although
they do not have a walnut veneer, they follow the same design
and doubtless come under the `brown and gold' entries, as seen
in the bill. The Unknown Lady coincides with the time
bracket of this bill. Both frames still have an applied, moulded
top edge and gilt inner edges (re-gilded). It is a plain design,
yet distinctive and easily recognisable. These three works all
have tapered mitre joints on the reverse, expected on frames
of the period.
Skirving used Chalmers for a variety of services ranging from
making packing boxes to the more unusual "carrying a
bust several times". The William Bruce "Inventory
and Appraisement of Sundry Effects which belonged to the late
Mr Archibald Skirving" shows that he also rented a house
from Chalmers. Skirving had no hesitation in dealing frankly
with his clients and certainly would have changed framers had
he not been satisfied with their work. Although he used the same
framer for four years, this does not mean that he did not commission
the service of other framemakers during these years. As a highly
regarded portraitist of the time, Skirving would not be expected
to use a substandard framer. Unfortunately the receipts and correspondence,
which he is meant to have fastidiously kept and may have been
a great source of information, are now destroyed. However, the
visual evidence of the exhibition allows several stylistic elements
and frame types to be positively associated with Skirving.
Contact address: l.houliston@vam.ac.uk
Acknowledgements: Thanks go to Stephen
Lloyd of the Scottish National Portrait Gallery and Keith Morrison
of the National Galleries of Scotland. |
|