The Gallery holds the most extensive collection of portraits in the world. Search over 215,000 works, 150,000 of which are illustrated from the 16th Century to the present day.

Advanced Collection search

Sir Squire Bancroft (né Butterfield)

Sir Squire Bancroft (né Butterfield), by Hugh Goldwin Riviere, 1900 -NPG 2121 - © National Portrait Gallery, London

© National Portrait Gallery, London

Later Victorian Portraits Catalogue Search

Sir Squire Bancroft (né Butterfield)

by Hugh Goldwin Riviere
Oil on canvas, 1900
59 in. x 39 in. (1499 mm x 991 mm)
NPG 2121

Inscriptionback to top

Signed in red paint, lower left: ‘HRiviere.1900’.
Gilt plaque on frame lower edge: ‘Sir Squire Bancroft Bancroft / 1844–1926 / Actor: manager of the old Prince of Wales’s Theatre, 1867–79 and / afterwards of the Haymarket Theatre till his retirement in 1885. / Painted, 1900, by Hugh Riviere / Bequeathed, 1926, by Sir Squire Bancroft (2121).’
On upper stretcher, damaged label: ‘Sir Squire Bancroft / Hugh G Riviere 38 D … [illegible] Place’;
on upper rear edge of frame, label: ‘22647 / Dolman & Son’.

This portraitback to top

The commission for this portrait presumably came about through the Bancrofts’ acquaintance with the artist’s father, a celebrated animal painter. ‘Briton Riviere was for many years our friend. We first met in the Engadine,’ wrote Squire. ‘He was, in my opinion, a great artist, and has crowded my memory with his works, I think often of those speaking dogs in The Vacant Chair [sic], Sympathy and Charity, as I do of Circe and the amorous pigs, and the majestic Daniel facing the lions in their den.’ [1]

Squire is shown here in characteristic pose, standing with hands on hips as if arrested in the midst of some activity or having risen from the chair on which lies an open book (not apparently a playscript). His tall, lean physical presence is accentuated by the vertical view with plain background. Surprisingly, he is incorrectly depicted with an eyeglass in his left eye, raising the possibility that the portrait was completed with the assistance of photographs, which frequently showed his features reversed. His white hair contrasts with his dark moustache, and he wears a tie-pin with a blue stone.

It seems possible that the commission was prompted by dissatisfaction at the earlier portrait of Squire by Thomas Jones Barker, which had been exhibited at the Victorian Era exhibition in London, but is not subsequently recorded (see ‘All known portraits, In private character, Paintings, drawings, sculptures and prints, c.1879–80’). The present work was admired, although the paint is unhappily lumpy in places, and seriously wrinkled in others (chiefly face and hand), as if inexpertly applied. It is set in a very large, ornate and now rather damaged frame. A replica copy, whose surface looks smoother, was commissioned from Riviere by fellow-members of the Garrick Club (see ‘All known portraits, In private character, Paintings, drawings, sculptures and prints, 1900’). [2]

In his memoirs, Bancroft alluded to the ‘great happiness’ of his long membership of the Garrick Club, and long service on the club’s committee, from 1877. He added: ‘Among the club’s notable collection of works of art connected with the stage, I have the honour to be represented by a replica of the portrait of myself painted for me by my young friend Hugh Riviere, the son of my old friend Briton Riviere.’ [3]

The present work, which is mentioned as hanging in his Albany apartment, [4] was bequeathed by Squire to the National Portrait Gallery, together with his wife’s portrait (see entry for NPG 2122). In February 1928 the artist complained to the Gallery about the positioning of the work. He wrote:

I am sure you agree that where the lighting of a picture can be made passably good without interfering with other work, this should be done. I refer to my rather beastly but publicly interesting Portrait of Sir Squire Bancroft … As it is hanging quite alone on the screen, a liberal tilt forward … would allow the public to see something at any rate of the Picture instead of it being just a reflection of the window. [5]

Dr Jan Marsh

Footnotesback to top

1) Bancroft 1925, p.36.
2) In 1909 a portrait of the Bancrofts’ daughter-in-law by Riviere was shown at RA (113).
3) Bancroft & Bancroft 1909, p.373.
4) See Furniss 1925, p.132.
5) Letter from H.G. Riviere to H.H. Hake, 10 Feb. 1928, NPG RP 2121. The defects of paint application make the artist’s adjective ‘beastly’ unintentionally appropriate.

Physical descriptionback to top

Three-quarter-length to front, standing with hands on hips against ox-blood background, monocle shown in left eye, book open on chair to right.

Conservationback to top

Conserved, 1926; 1994.

Provenanceback to top

Bequeathed by sitter, 1926.

Exhibitionsback to top

Royal Academy, London, 1900 (568).

Reproductionsback to top

[Cassell] 1900, p.52.

Bancroft & Bancroft 1909, facing p.352.

View all known portraits for Sir Squire Bancroft (né Butterfield)

Join

Become a Member

Enjoy access to special events, discounts on the Gallery online shop, supporters’ updates and much more

Join today

Get social

Bringing people together by sharing the portraits and stories of the men and women who have shaped our nation.

Facebook Instagram Twitter

Newsletter

Sign up to receive information on exhibitions, collections and activities of the National Portrait Gallery, including special offers, shop products, and exclusive competitions.

Sign up